American Family Comes To Finland, Seeks Refugee Status: Are Things Really THIS Bad In America?

21 09 2007

American Refugees - Twango
Here’s a headline from a free newspaper, Uutislehti 100, which made me wonder: “American Family Seeks Refuge”

I’m sorry, what? Are things really THIS bad, politically or otherwise, in the United States? Allow me to translate and paraphrase the newspaper clipping for those of you who don’t speak Finnish:

An American family of five is seeking refuge in Finland. The man and woman with their three underage children arrived at the Helsinki-Vantaa International Airport on Tuesday (Sep 18) from Germany. The papers for seeking refuge were filed at the airport and the claim is being processed at the Finnish Directorate of Immigration.
No further details concerning the reasons and ground for seeking refuge were released.
Finland considers the United States a safe country and the claims for refugee status will be processed with that in mind.
Because the family arrived in Finland from Germany, the processing of any claims for refugee status should be dealt with in Germany.
[Source: Uutislehti 100/STT]


Most likely the family will not be granted refugee status as they’re not exactly coming from a war-torn country and they aren’t being persecuted for their religious or political views.

Which brings me to my earlier question: are things really so bad in America that Americans are moving to the Old World in search of a safe haven? Is it really that bad to be under the leadership of Dubya? The next presidential elections in America are getting truly underway in mere months as the preliminaries kick off in February. Change is (possibly) just around the corner. Patience America, patience. Political change is coming. You know that the first thing each incoming President does is attempt to undo everything the previous President achieved or messed up…

I can’t fathom, for the life of me, why any American would seek refuge anywhere, especially in Finland. Sure, Finland is far more liberal than the U.S., especially right now, but hey, we don’t even have Wal-Mart or Taco Bell (we do have universal healthcare, free education, one of the best public transportation systems in the world, the least corruption in the world, etc etc…)!

Can you figure out a possible reason why an American family might file a claim for refugee status in another Western nation?

I’ll update this post if any more news is published about the family and their reasons for seeking refuge in Finland.

Source:
Uutislehti 100, September 21st 2007, Issue #154 (2339)





Where Were You On September 11th, 2001?

11 09 2007

September 11th, 2001 is our generation’s D-Day or Pearl Harbor, to name a few, a catastrophic event which is remembered by asking people where they were when it happened.

Today marks the 6th anniversary of the 9/11 terrorist attacks in the United States. There’ll be demonstrations and there’ll be remembrance events. Will there be another terrorist attack? Probably not. Too obvious. Today is most likely the safest day to fly in America. Then there’s all the conspiracy theories of the events of 9/11. Do you believe in any of them? Was 9/11 an inside job? If you know any “credible” theories of 9/11 on the net, add the link with a small description below in the comments section!

Six years ago today I was a senior in high school in Hungary, on a bus with the other seniors, heading to Bovec, Slovenia for fall trips. Around the half point of our 12-hour bus ride, our school director paused the movie we were watching and announced that there’s been an incident in New York. It was around the time that people knew that it wasn’t an accident. Naturally, blame was immediately attributed to several powers, such as Muslims, Palestinians, and Americans. Someone even suggested the Japanese… Obviously, none of us had any clue as to what had really happened. We were on a bus with barely any means of communication to the outside world, with the exception of the school director calling the school a few times to get updates and one student’s Nokia Communicator from which was somewhat broken as only about one word out of four were legible from the screen. What he managed to decipher from one piece of news was that in the region of 50,000-100,000 had died. What was left out was that that number was the number of people working in the Twin Towers on a normal day. You can imagine the panic that some people went through. There were some 35ish of us on the bus from many different nationalities, mainly Americans. Upon reaching our destination, most of us retreated into our hotel rooms to watch the news on TV. Spending the trip in a room with two Americans, what was surprising was that I was the one who stayed up until 2am to watch President Bush’s speech to the nation and the rest of the world… The next evening, we got drunk on Slovenian wine.

So, where were you on September 11th, 2001? What did you do that day? Where were you when you first heard about the attacks? Please reply in the comments section below!

CommentRight comment care tool





China’s Reaction To Tainted Products

13 07 2007

I was watching the CNN Now In The News podcast this morning and the last story provoked some thoughts from me.

The bit of news was about the tainted food and drug products from China that’ve been in the news recently. Here’s the transcript of that report: (I apologize for any inconsistencies between the transcript and the actual footage. It might not be perfect due to the fact that I was transcribing it while on the bus…)

TRANSCRIPT:

“China is vowing to improve its food and drug safety. Tainted ingredients have turned up in domestic and exported products.”

“You’ve probably heard about them earlier this year. Chinese wheat gluten tainted with melamin was blamed for the deaths of dogs and cats in North America.”

“Since then, U.S. authorities have turned away imports of Chinese products including toxic fish, unsafe juice and toys decorated with lead paint.”

“Today the former head of China’s Food and Drug Administration [FDA] was executed for taking bribes to approve substandard medicine for use in his country.”

Wait, go back to that last bit. They executed a government official for taking bribes? Isn’t that a little harsh?

Now there’s the offset chance that the two instances are not related (they were under two different headings, CHINA FOOD SAFETY and FOOD BOSS EXECUTED. But I doubt it… The Chinese FDA messes up, vows to clean up it’s act, and executes its former boss… Wow…

I never knew that corruption was a crime punishable by death. But then again, in 2004, China executed some 3,400 people. For a country of 1.3 billion people, that’s not too much, right? Well, that number represents 90% of all the executions carried out that year.

For a few more statistics, in 2006, China executed at least 1,010 people, although other sources say that the real number is between 7,500 and 8,000). Iran executed 177 people, Pakistan 82, Iraq at least 65, Sudan, likewise, at least 65, and in sixth place comes the United States with 53 executions. [Source]

You can subscribe to or watch the podcast at cnn.com/services/podcasting or download the episode here. [MPEG-14 16mb 2.39min]

Sources:
CNN Now In The News (Video Podcast) [Links to complete CNN podcast list]
Capital punishment – Wikipedia





Poll: Who Will Be Elected President in 2008?

28 06 2007

Actually, this is two polls; one for the Democrats and one for the Republicans.

Who Be Will Elected President in 2008: Democrats
1) Hillary Clinton
2) Barack Obama
3) Al Gore
4) John Edwards
5) Bill Richardson
6) Joe Biden
7) Dennis Kucinich
8) Other
View Results

Who Will Be Elected President In 2008: Republicans
1) Rudy Giuliani
2) Fred Thompson
3) John McCain
4) Mitt Romney
5) Newt Gingrich
6) Mike Huckabee
7) Ron Paul
8) Other
View Results
Make your own poll

This poll was originally posted to my other blog, Existential Questions, where I collect life’s important questions. The website originally began from a group on Facebook. Feel free to contribute to the discussions!





GOP Chief: More Terrorist Attacks On U.S. Soil, Please. ¿Que?

25 06 2007

In an interview with the Arkansas Democrat-Gazette, the new head of the Arkansas Republican Party, Dennis Milligan stated that he is “150 percent” behind Bush on the war in Iraq.

Milligan also said that America needs more terrorist attacks on its soil.

That’s not a misprint. He actually said that. Here, see for yourself:

At the end of the day, I believe fully the president is doing the right thing, and I think all we need is some attacks on American soil like we had on [Sept. 11, 2001], and the naysayers will come around very quickly to appreciate not only the commitment for President Bush, but the sacrifice that has been made by men and women to protect this country.”

Wow… What the hell?

Maybe what Milligan said about President Bush’s latest immigration bill shines some light on his state of mind:

“That is between the president and Congress, and I am just going to let them hash it out and work it out. I just think that is something for probably smarter people than me to figure out. It is a tough situation either way, but something definitely needs to be done.”

Yup, he said it. There’s smarter people than him. BIG surprise…

Sources:
Arkansas Democrat-Gazette: GOP chief: New strategy key





Homeland Security Guards Not Paid Nor Trained Enough

21 06 2007

Potential terrorist targets within the United States are not as well protected as one might assume. Ill-trained and low-paid private security guards stand by skyscrapers, unsure what to do in the event of a terrorist attack. Convicted criminals slip through the net, as background checks aren’t always enforced. Training for security guards is inadequate at best, the equipment insufficient, the directions vague and ludicrous.

After 9/11, the one industry which saw a great demand for its services in the wake of terror scares was the security guard industry. The men and women in uniform in the industry found themselves being “promoted” from rent-a-cops to protectors of the homeland.

Changes in the industry itself must have occurred simultaneously, from better training to increased enrollment and a bigger paycheck, right?

This is where business ethics and corporate rules come into play.

Remember that the men and women who work as security guards at sites designated as potential terrorist targets by the Bush Administration are not on the government payroll. They work for private security contractors, who battle with each other over government contracts to provide security for these locations.

As such, the security companies operate with typical business models.

Business rule #1: To save money, start with your employees.

Large corporations are always trying to cut costs to make more money, and a bigger bonus for the executives. And why not smaller companies too? It’s business, after all. Concerning employees, there are two ways to save money. Either you lay off “unnecessary” employees, or you pay them less. (read: minimum wage.)

Security guards are generally paid very little. Their median hourly pay in 2006 was $11.35, which is only slightly more than restaurant cooks ($10.11), janitors ($10.45) and laboratory animal caretakers ($10.13).

Security guards are typically assumed to belong to the same paygroup (because their jobs are similar in nature) as police patrol officers ($23.27), emergency management specialists ($24.26) and firefighters ($20.37).

Keep in mind that the numbers above are the median hourly income, not the industry minimum wage. There are security guards out there who make a lot less than $11.35/hour.

The middle ground pay for security guards in 2006 was $23,620/year, well below the national average income.

Business rule #2:Hire people who’ll work for less.

If there’s no law forbidding you from hiring just about anyone, why don’t you? There are a lot of people (criminals, ex-convicts, illegal immigrants, the mentally ill, etc…) who have a hard time finding jobs, due to their backgrounds or present status.

The differences in requirements for training and background checks differ vastly between states and the rules to provide for background checks within the security industry are conflicting.

Some states require FBI fingerprint checks for every applicant applying for a guard job, whilst others let the industry police itself. Some states don’t regulate the industry, such as Alabama, Colorado, Kansas, Mississippi, Missouri, Nebraska, South Dakota, Kentucky, Wyoming and Idaho. Yet,the city of Boise and many Idaho communities do regulate guards. Some states require background checks for company owners but not guards, which kinda diffuses the purpose.

Security firms which go through background checks have found tens of thousands of guard applicants having criminal backgrounds, some 7.3% of applicants. This number does not include the applicants with criminal records who didn’t go through background checks.

Instead, they got jobs as security guards. I’m all for rehabilitating ex-cons and hiring them, but what about the ones who’ve been convicted of serious felonies, such as murder, arson, aggravated assault, armed robbery, and so on? What’s to stop them from continuing while on the clock?

In fact, there are reports of guards with criminal backgrounds having committed criminal offenses on and off duty in numerous cities.

Business rule #3:Cut corners at every turn to save that extra penny. Start with training and equipment.

The training of security guards is typically inadequate, usually performed by someone not trained for such a lesson. But hey, there’s plenty of manuals on the matter, just get someone to read the manual to the guards! That’ll work just as well…

Security and evacuation drills? Waste of money and time. Any more advice? “Look smart and if someone attacks the building, call the police.”

Does this seem like adequate training?:
Franklin Bullock, 51, a guard at the busy bus and rail commuter station in Kent, Wash., said he’s had no drills with police and fire responders despite terrorist bombings of trains and buses overseas. A supervisor once tested Bullock by walking him down the platform to see whether he would spot a package he could hardly miss. It had “BOM” written on it. That was the end of his useful hands-on training…

We know that “terrorists” can be idiots as is to judge from the planned attack on JFK airport, but come on, this is ridiculous.

The ineffectiveness of the guards, due to lack of training, is particularly evident in this event:
In fall 2005, an envelope with suspicious powder was opened by guards at the Washington headquarters of the Homeland Security Department. The guards carried the substance past the office of Secretary Michael Chertoff, took it outside and then shook it outside Chertoff’s window without evacuating people nearby. The powder turned out to be harmless.

Proper equipment? Private guards at military bases have complained that they were trained to use handguns and nightsticks to fight terrorists who might be equipped with assault rifles and grenade launchers.

Business rule #4: Business means money, nothing else. Make everything seem to be just fine, even when they’re not.

Security firm insiders have noted that when it is known that learn military inspectors are on the way, patrols are increased, and just about anyone in the corporate structure is made to play the part of a security guard.

The low pay of security guards reflects the cutthroat competition between private security companies, battling for the contracts by offering the lowest bids. Cheaper bids mean lower profit margins and less money for training and background checks for guards. You’d think they’d save some money by paying their employees less money, but hey, it’s business…

As the market for private security boomed after 9/11, companies which employ private guards began spending more on security, but, in the absence of further terrorist attacks, have began to cut back on spending.

There’s some hope for the security industry in the end as some companies have decided to conduct anti-terrorism training, regardless of whether their clients will cover the cost.

As the security guards and the whole industry seems to be in a bit of a pickle in the event of an actual terrorist attack, how’s about the TSA guards at the nation’s airports? Are they being paid better? It seems that there is a certain hierarchy in the whole anti-terrorism complex in the United States, dumping responsibility on those below one other.

If a terrorist attack occurs within the United States, the fingers start pointing in every direction. The Bush Administration is blamed for providing a cause celebre for the terrorists, the CIA and the FBI are blamed for not catching the bad guys before they attack, the TSA guards are blamed if the terrorists manage to get on the planes, and the private security guards get blamed if an attack occurs on their building.

You can’t expect the world of everyone individually, as the anti-terrorism game is one where everyone needs to work together.

How do you blame a private security guard for not protecting a skyscraper when someone flies a jumbo jet into it?

As a final final thought, as I was writing this post, a bit of related news popped into my RSS reader. Apparently, a private security guard at Walter Reed fired at his colleague, a whole ten shots, thankfully without injuring him. (Link: CNN.com) This is the level of training and the kind of people hired for these jobs. The two guards had been arguing and one of them started shooting at the other. Didn’t hit him though. But what if it had been terrorists? The guy fired 10 shots at his colleague without hitting him. How would he perform in the event that someone is shooting back at him?

Sources:
CBS News: Homeland Security Guards; Paid Little





IRS & DHS Not Too Good At Catching Terrorists

9 06 2007

The Department of Homeland Security (DHS) hunts terrorists within America, right? Well, their focus seems to be elsewhere, it seems. The Internal Revenue Service (IRS) has also been found to be poor at finding terrorists. Did you know the IRS was supposed to be hunting terrorists? Neither did I.

The IRS is supposed to be identifying tax-exempt groups that may have links to terrorists, a task it has been found to be doing a poor job at, not so surprisingly.

The IRS manually compares the records of charitable and other nonprofit groups to a limited terrorist watch list.

In 2006, there were some 1.6 million tax-exempt organizations, excluding churches.

The terrorist watch list, maintained by the Treasury Department Office of Foreign Asset Control (OFAC), contains a mere 1,600 unique terrorist and organization names or aliases. For the sake of comparison, the Terrorist Screening Center, an interagency operation run by the FBI, contains more than 200,000 names suspected of terrorist activities. Slight difference…

The IRS apparently looks for “Middle Eastern-sounding names” when investigating the tax filings, figuring out which cases to flag for further review. That’s a pretty biased and narrow perspective to employ when trying to halt the flow of U.S. dollars to terrorist organizations. Anyone with a non-Middle Eastern-sounding name who funds terrorism easily slips under the radar of the IRS.

Most, actually all but a single digit number, of flagged cases were approved for tax-exempt status because they didn’t match the limited list in use.

In regard to the DHS, an organization which is technically supposed to be the nation’s primary authority on catching terrorists on U.S. soil, their focus seems to be a little askew. The DHS charged 814,073 individuals in the part three years. A respectable number of charges, yet only 12 of them faced terrorism charges. That’s 0.0015% of all cases that the DHS filed.

The findings were released by the Transactional Records Action Clearinghouse (TRAC), which is associated with Syracuse University, from documents attained through the Freedom of Information Act.

The DHS claims it is focused on terrorism, and calls the findings of the TRAC study “ill-conceived”.

The TRAC analysis alre found that the DHS only filed 114 national security charges in the past 3 years, a mere 0.014% of all cases.

The majority of the charges included more common immigration violations such not having a valid immigrant visa, overstaying a student visa or entering the United States without an inspection.

According to the DHS, clamping down on all forms of immigration has made it difficult for terrorists to come to the United States.

A TRAC spokesman stated that: “Either there’s no terrorism, or they’re terrible at catching them. Either way it’s bad for all of us.” How is no terrorism bad for America?

Sources:
Yahoo! News: Report: IRS poor at finding terrorists
Transactional Records Action Clearinghouse (TRAC)





Identity Thiefs Empty Accounts, Bank Sues For Overdraft

9 06 2007

Identity thieves wipe out your bank account, robbing you of your life savings. Things couldn’t get any worse, could they?

Leave it to the Bank of America to comfort victims of identity theft, in their own special way: by slapping the victim with a lawsuit demanding $23,312.04…

The victim, Gloria Carlo, 51, is a single mom from the South Bronx.

Bank of America, which has declined to comment on the issue, claimed in the lawsuit that she overdrew her accounts in a two-month home-shopping spending spree. Before this, she had allegedly spend her entire life savings of $38,000.

In total, according to her lawyer, Gloria Carlo lost $68,733.77 in the apparent identity-theft scam.

After the disappearance of her savings, she filed a police report and an affidavit of fraud, as well as protesting to the bank.

When it looked as if things couldn’t get any worse, personal tragedies occured with the death of her mother and brother, as well as her own health deteriorating due to heart failure and pulmonary embolism.

After a short stay in hospital a few months back, she returned home to find the court summons, courtesy of her bank. All they cared about was the overdraft.

A little bit of browsing on Bank of America’s website provided some interesting information. Bank of America offers an identity theft protection option for a low $12.99/month (30-day trial at no cost).

$25,000 of identity theft insurance with no deductable.

Sounds good, I guess…

If you become a victim of identity theft, you’ll be covered for certain items by an Identity Fraud Expense Coverage at no additional cost.

I’m a little baffled at what exactly “covered for certain items” really means. Nevertheless, I guess Gloria Carlo didn’t have this coverage. Oh, wait, there’s more!

This coverage is not available to New York residents.

Let me get this straight: if you are a customer of Bank of America and happen to become a victim of identity theft, the bank will assist you for certain lost items (which logic would tell me means money, but who knows), provided you are paying the bank $12.99 a month ($155.88/year) for such coverage. But, if you happen to live in the state of New York, well, you’re fucked. Nice.

Isn’t it nice that Bank of America offers such coverage? Although, if you don’t have said coverage (or live in New York), they will sue you for the overdraft. That is exactly how you wish your bank to comfort you when you have just lost every penny on your bank accounts, isn’t it?

Everyone, check your bank’s policy concerning Identity Theft, before your bank sues you for the money you haven’t spent…

Sources:
New York Post (via Digg)





Poll: War In Iraq Not Going So Well…

9 06 2007

A CBS News/New York Times poll conducted in May showed that support for the Bush Administration’s war in Iraq has hit an all-time low. 76% of Americans say that the war is going badly, and increase of 10% since April.

Of those polled, 47% say the war is going very badly.

Along party lines, 52% of Republicans say the war is going (at least somewhat) badly, rising 16% since April. Some 90% of Democrats and 80% of Independents aren’t happy with the direction of the war.

Interestingly enough, 20% of those polled said that the recent U.S. troop increase is making a positive difference. Don’t these people follow the news at all? It’s recently been reported that U.S. casulties are on the rise and that only a third of Baghdad is under U.S. and Iraqi government control…

Other (related) issues polled about stated very similar views about the war, the Administration, and the Congress. 61% of those polled believe the U.S. should have stayed out of Iraq, calling it a mistake from the beginning.

Most worryingly though, the American people are beginning to feel very pessimistic about the direction the nation is heading: 72% feel America is headed in the wrong direction. Could this have anything to do with the price of gas?

Bush’s approval rating is still hanging in the thirties, with a nice, round 30%. Congress fared slightly better, with an approval rating of 36%.

It’s interesting to note that in vetoing the was funding bill which contained a timetable for a U.S. troop withdrawal from Iraq, President Bush went against the will of the people as six in 10 Americans would have supported the timetable.

Anybody surprised by the results? Show of hands, please…

As a footnote, the poll ended with the typical disclaimer:
This poll was conducted among a random sample of 1,125 adults nationwide, interviewed by telephone May 18-23, 2007. The error due to sampling for results based on the entire sample could be plus or minus three percentage points. The error for subgroups is higher. An oversample of African Americans was also conducted for this poll, for a total of 192 interviews among this group. The results were then weighted in proportion to the racial composition of the adult population in the U.S. Census. The margin of error for African Americans is plus or minus 7 percentage points.

Someone explain to me why the margin of error for African Americans is a whole 4 percentage points higher than the rest of the polled? Is there something we’re not being told here?

Source:
http://www.cbsnews.com/stories/2007/05/24/opinion/polls/main2846638.shtml





Hurricane Katrina v.2.0 Could Be On It’s Way This Summer

2 04 2007

The U.S. Gulf Coast could be facing Katrina-esque Hurricanes this coming Hurricane Season, which lasts from June to November.

Although the 2006 season was distinctly milder than previously predicted, the coming 2007 season could threaten the Gulf with several high intensity storms.

Even a single high intensity storm hitting the areas affected by Hurricane Katrina, which is still rebuilding after almost two years Katrina, could have devastating effects, reaching beyond the damage brought on by the 2005 storm season.

Although this year’s predictions suggest fewer storms than during the active 2005 season, the forecast for the region will pack a punch. In other words, fewer storms but stronger in intensity.

British forecasting group Tropical Storm Risk predicted up to four “intense” hurricanes during the 2007 season.

Hurricane Katrina killed about 1,500 people along the Gulf Coast in 2005, displaced tens of thousands more and caused billions of dollars in damage.

The issue that could strike every American, as well as the rest of the world, is that if the U.S. Gulf Coast is hit again by severe storms, they could once again disrupt oil and natural gas operations along the Gulf, driving up energy prices for consumers.

U.S. gasoline prices reached a record high of $3.057 per gallon after Katrina.

Aside from the Gulf Coast, AccuWeather also predicted that the U.S. Northeast would likely be a target for strong storms for the next 10 years.

With several months left before the start of this year’s hurricane season, it’s about time the Bush Administration listens to the warnings and gets to work preparing for the coming hurricanes.

The aftermath of (as well as the preparation for) Hurricane Katrina showed the inefficiency of the Bush Administration and FEMA to deal with impending natural disasters.

Truth of the matter is, the American people are at a greater risk from the forces of nature than from anything terrorists can throw at the United States.

New Orleans and other affected places are still in shatters, the population still spread around the States, with little incentive from the Government to return home and start their lives over. If any of Hurricane Katrina’s relatives decide to visit New Orleans this summer, and the Bush Administration hasn’t learnt it’s lessons, heads will roll. And it won’t only be some pencil pushers at FEMA this time, but rather in the White House. Time will tell…

I’ll leave you with a quote from Joe Bastardi, chief hurricane forecaster for AccuWeather.com:
“We are living in a time of climatic hardship. We’re in a cycle where weather extremes are more the norm and not the exception.”

Sources:
Strong hurricanes to hit U.S. Gulf in 07: AccuWeather – Yahoo! News
http://news.yahoo.com/s/nm/20070327/ts_nm/usa_weather_forecast_accuweather_dc